Discussion:
[STUMP] StumpWM 1.0.0 Released!
David Bjergaard
2017-01-12 18:14:25 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I intended,
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase and
making the project more future proof.

That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports many
lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also represents
the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From now on we will be
introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when they decrease our
maintenance overhead.

You can find the code in the usual places:
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/

Long live StumpWM!

David (your humble maintainer)
m***@gmail.com
2017-01-12 18:38:33 UTC
Permalink
Thank you very much for this awesome window manager.

I hope that this program improve too much!!!
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I
intended, but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the
codebase and making the project more future proof.
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports
many lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also
represents the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From
now on we will be introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when
they decrease our maintenance overhead.
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
Long live StumpWM!
David (your humble maintainer)
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Dany Haddad
2017-01-12 19:22:44 UTC
Permalink
Great news! Thank you!


dmh
Post by m***@gmail.com
Thank you very much for this awesome window manager.
I hope that this program improve too much!!!
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I
intended, but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the
codebase and making the project more future proof.
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports
many lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also
represents the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From
now on we will be introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when
they decrease our maintenance overhead.
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
Long live StumpWM!
David (your humble maintainer)
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Eric Abrahamsen
2017-01-23 00:43:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I intended,
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase and
making the project more future proof.
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports many
lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also represents
the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From now on we will be
introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when they decrease our
maintenance overhead.
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
Long live StumpWM!
David (your humble maintainer)
I saw the release on hacker news -- congratulations! Whatever SBCL
threading thing was making Stump unusable for me seems to be resolved,
and I've now dumped i3 and am happy to be back.

Thanks!

Eric
Daniel Pimentel
2017-01-23 11:57:22 UTC
Permalink
Thanks for great work!

---
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)
Post by Eric Abrahamsen
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I intended,
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase and
making the project more future proof.
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports many
lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also represents
the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From now on we will be
introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when they decrease our
maintenance overhead.
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
Long live StumpWM!
David (your humble maintainer)
I saw the release on hacker news -- congratulations! Whatever SBCL
threading thing was making Stump unusable for me seems to be resolved,
and I've now dumped i3 and am happy to be back.
Thanks!
Eric
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Jean Louis
2017-01-25 08:21:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I intended,
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase and
making the project more future proof.
That is very unfortunate, as I used CLISP. I guess I will continue
using the latest supported version.
Post by David Bjergaard
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports many
lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also represents
the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From now on we will be
introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when they decrease our
maintenance overhead.
Too bad for me.
Post by David Bjergaard
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
It would be nice that I don't need any Github account and that
development is on some non-proprietary software.

Jean Louis
Elias Mårtenson
2017-01-25 10:00:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Bjergaard
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I
intended,
Post by David Bjergaard
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase
and
Post by David Bjergaard
making the project more future proof.
That is very unfortunate, as I used CLISP. I guess I will continue
using the latest supported version.
I don't want you to think I'm trying to tell you what to do, but CLISP is
pretty much abandonware and hasn't had a release in about 7 years.

Are there any particular reasons you can't use SBCL?

Regards,
Elias
David Bjergaard
2017-01-25 18:07:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jean Louis
Post by David Bjergaard
Hi,
I just released StumpWM 1.0.0. Its not the final version of StumpWM I intended,
but I think its the right way to go in terms of modernizing the codebase and
making the project more future proof.
That is very unfortunate, as I used CLISP. I guess I will continue
using the latest supported version.
StumpWM is quickly approaching its 10th birthday. I would really like to see it
make its 20th as well. In order to do that I've had to make difficult decisions
about how we support and maintain the project.
Post by Jean Louis
Post by David Bjergaard
That being said, 1.0.0 will be the last release that explicitly supports many
lisp distributions. From now on we will only support sbcl. It also represents
the last release that only depends on clx and cl-ppcre. From now on we will be
introducing dependencies when it makes sense and when they decrease our
maintenance overhead.
Too bad for me.
Post by David Bjergaard
https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/releases/tag/v1.0.0
https://stumpwm.github.io/
It would be nice that I don't need any Github account and that
development is on some non-proprietary software.
You're welcome to fork the 1.0 release and continue developing it using whatever
VCS you prefer. You're also welcome to send critical patches to the 1.0 release
to this mailing list for the benefit of others. You may even leverage git for
some of these features:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9630774/how-to-make-pull-requests-without-a-github-account

I don't know what you mean by "proprietary software" stuwmpwm itself is GPL2,
github supports free software even if its a SaaS, as mentioned above you can
contribute without supporting or buying into github. CLISP and SBCL have
different licenses, but the benefits of SBCL outweigh the benefits of CLISP on
every other count. Further, neither CLISP or SBCL are proprietary software.
Post by Jean Louis
Jean Louis
Jean Louis
2017-01-25 19:51:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Bjergaard
Post by Jean Louis
It would be nice that I don't need any Github account and that
development is on some non-proprietary software.
You're welcome to fork the 1.0 release and continue developing it using whatever
VCS you prefer. You're also welcome to send critical patches to the 1.0 release
to this mailing list for the benefit of others. You may even leverage git for
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9630774/how-to-make-pull-requests-without-a-github-account
I don't know what you mean by "proprietary software" stuwmpwm itself is GPL2,
github supports free software even if its a SaaS, as mentioned above you can
contribute without supporting or buying into github. CLISP and SBCL have
different licenses, but the benefits of SBCL outweigh the benefits of CLISP on
every other count. Further, neither CLISP or SBCL are proprietary software.
Yes, I know. I referred to Github, not the other software. I like that
Stumpwm is hosted at nongnu or gnu, whatever. Mailing list is open to
everybody. But bug reporting on Github is not.

I support free software. And often I support programmers with some
money contributions.

How can I appreciate the Github business model earning moneys on free
software, while not making Github free software? Read:
http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html
-- like "The GPL is not focused on freedom. It's too long. Too many
restrictions", or "Notice that everything we keep closed has specific
business value that could be compromised by giving it away to our
competitors. -- source: Tom Preston-Werner's" from
http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html

Here is one analysis of Github:
https://mikegerwitz.com/about/githubbub

Free software project shall not be on Github. There is Gitlab and
there are many other possibilities. Finally, why not host oneself?
Even VPS hosting today is so inexpensive.

Jean
Javier Olaechea
2017-01-26 00:49:05 UTC
Permalink
One can still use the mailing list to report bugs and submit code
contributions.
Post by David Bjergaard
Post by David Bjergaard
Post by Jean Louis
It would be nice that I don't need any Github account and that
development is on some non-proprietary software.
You're welcome to fork the 1.0 release and continue developing it using
whatever
Post by David Bjergaard
VCS you prefer. You're also welcome to send critical patches to the 1.0
release
Post by David Bjergaard
to this mailing list for the benefit of others. You may even leverage
git for
Post by David Bjergaard
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9630774/how-to-make-
pull-requests-without-a-github-account
Post by David Bjergaard
I don't know what you mean by "proprietary software" stuwmpwm itself is
GPL2,
Post by David Bjergaard
github supports free software even if its a SaaS, as mentioned above you
can
Post by David Bjergaard
contribute without supporting or buying into github. CLISP and SBCL have
different licenses, but the benefits of SBCL outweigh the benefits of
CLISP on
Post by David Bjergaard
every other count. Further, neither CLISP or SBCL are proprietary
software.
Yes, I know. I referred to Github, not the other software. I like that
Stumpwm is hosted at nongnu or gnu, whatever. Mailing list is open to
everybody. But bug reporting on Github is not.
I support free software. And often I support programmers with some
money contributions.
How can I appreciate the Github business model earning moneys on free
http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html
-- like "The GPL is not focused on freedom. It's too long. Too many
restrictions", or "Notice that everything we keep closed has specific
business value that could be compromised by giving it away to our
competitors. -- source: Tom Preston-Werner's" from
http://tom.preston-werner.com/2011/11/22/open-source-everything.html
https://mikegerwitz.com/about/githubbub
Free software project shall not be on Github. There is Gitlab and
there are many other possibilities. Finally, why not host oneself?
Even VPS hosting today is so inexpensive.
Jean
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
Loading...